<?xml version='1.0' encoding='UTF-8'?><?xml-stylesheet href="http://www.blogger.com/styles/atom.css" type="text/css"?><feed xmlns='http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom' xmlns:openSearch='http://a9.com/-/spec/opensearchrss/1.0/'><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-10889081.post713644857246051424..comments</id><updated>2009-04-27T15:37:20.999-04:00</updated><category term='Online Poker'/><category term='PokerTracker'/><category term='Enet Poker'/><category term='Merge'/><category term='WSOP'/><category term='World Poker Tour'/><category term='Poker After Dark'/><category term='Full Tilt'/><category term='Poker on TV'/><category term='Yatahay'/><category term='Entraction'/><category term='Everest'/><category term='Everleaf'/><category term='Poker on TV Update'/><category term='PokerStars'/><category term='Cake'/><category term='Poker Pro 101'/><category term='High Stakes Poker'/><category term='Bodog'/><category term='Hold&apos;em Manager'/><category term='PartyPoker'/><title type='text'>Comments on Online Poker Insiders: WSOP TV Schedule Analysis</title><link rel='http://schemas.google.com/g/2005#feed' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.onlinepokerinsiders.com/feeds/713644857246051424/comments/default'/><link rel='self' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/10889081/713644857246051424/comments/default'/><link rel='alternate' type='text/html' href='http://www.onlinepokerinsiders.com/2009/04/wsop-tv-schedule-analysis.html'/><author><name>Self Made</name><uri>http://www.blogger.com/profile/00288432340942450595</uri><email>noreply@blogger.com</email><gd:image xmlns:gd='http://schemas.google.com/g/2005' rel='http://schemas.google.com/g/2005#thumbnail' width='23' height='32' src='http://1.bp.blogspot.com/-WTdsUfaq_JU/TXHRrFhZShI/AAAAAAAAAZ4/ieHsIUvCizw/s220/jamesbond2.jpg'/></author><generator version='7.00' uri='http://www.blogger.com'>Blogger</generator><openSearch:totalResults>4</openSearch:totalResults><openSearch:startIndex>1</openSearch:startIndex><openSearch:itemsPerPage>25</openSearch:itemsPerPage><entry><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-10889081.post-6848111641044389685</id><published>2009-04-27T15:37:00.000-04:00</published><updated>2009-04-27T15:37:00.000-04:00</updated><title type='text'>Kevin:

I don't think "hoping someone makes a deep...</title><content type='html'>Kevin:&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;I don't think "hoping someone makes a deep run" is necessary, or realistic either, for the idea of following a player's progress through the tournament. The primary benefit of following one player would be that you'd get to know them, could root for them, and would get emotionally involved in the tournament. Also, you'd be able to see how play changes with the blinds rising, the bubble, etc. (be able to follow the course of the tournament). When someone busts out you could just switch to another player. I don't see any way to avoid that. ESPN's poker coverage is perhaps the worst of any sports broadcast on generating human interest and getting us into the drama of competition. They simply don't follow anything long enough for you to get into the competition, get to know the players, or root for anyone. It's mostly a collection of random soundbites, flitting back and forth between tables, bustouts, humorous segments, etc. This is especially true in the early/middle tournament. Following one player, even if the player had to change when he busted out, would allow you to get into the drama of the tournament and root for someone, something that's a common experience with any other sporting event I watch on TV. &lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;I'm not sure what your point is about the final table. Showing more of it, not knowing the results going in, and having it well edited are all important. I'd say showing more of it would be by far the most important of those three for improving it, however.</content><link rel='edit' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/10889081/713644857246051424/comments/default/6848111641044389685'/><link rel='self' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/10889081/713644857246051424/comments/default/6848111641044389685'/><link rel='alternate' type='text/html' href='http://www.onlinepokerinsiders.com/2009/04/wsop-tv-schedule-analysis.html?showComment=1240861020000#c6848111641044389685' title=''/><author><name>Fifth Street Journal</name><uri>http://www.blogger.com/profile/00288432340942450595</uri><email>noreply@blogger.com</email><gd:image xmlns:gd='http://schemas.google.com/g/2005' rel='http://schemas.google.com/g/2005#thumbnail' width='16' height='16' src='http://img2.blogblog.com/img/b16-rounded.gif'/></author><thr:in-reply-to xmlns:thr='http://purl.org/syndication/thread/1.0' href='http://www.onlinepokerinsiders.com/2009/04/wsop-tv-schedule-analysis.html' ref='tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-10889081.post-713644857246051424' source='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/10889081/posts/default/713644857246051424' type='text/html'/><gd:extendedProperty xmlns:gd='http://schemas.google.com/g/2005' name='blogger.itemClass' value='pid-2066854398'/></entry><entry><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-10889081.post-5251288061087752573</id><published>2009-04-27T13:48:00.000-04:00</published><updated>2009-04-27T13:48:00.000-04:00</updated><title type='text'>I understand the desire of wanting to follow a pla...</title><content type='html'>I understand the desire of wanting to follow a player, but how many players do you need to be following after the day 1's hoping someone makes a deep run?  Last year, Peter Eastgate made his first appearance on day 8.  I agree that more of the final table should be shown, but you're just extending slightly a problem you had last year, the amount of time to edit down from 9 to 2 to make a show that attempts to tell a story.  Does giving the production team a couple more days help matters?</content><link rel='edit' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/10889081/713644857246051424/comments/default/5251288061087752573'/><link rel='self' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/10889081/713644857246051424/comments/default/5251288061087752573'/><link rel='alternate' type='text/html' href='http://www.onlinepokerinsiders.com/2009/04/wsop-tv-schedule-analysis.html?showComment=1240854480000#c5251288061087752573' title=''/><author><name>Kevin Mathers</name><uri>http://www.blogger.com/profile/01873036833171980158</uri><email>noreply@blogger.com</email><gd:image xmlns:gd='http://schemas.google.com/g/2005' rel='http://schemas.google.com/g/2005#thumbnail' width='16' height='16' src='http://img2.blogblog.com/img/b16-rounded.gif'/></author><thr:in-reply-to xmlns:thr='http://purl.org/syndication/thread/1.0' href='http://www.onlinepokerinsiders.com/2009/04/wsop-tv-schedule-analysis.html' ref='tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-10889081.post-713644857246051424' source='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/10889081/posts/default/713644857246051424' type='text/html'/><gd:extendedProperty xmlns:gd='http://schemas.google.com/g/2005' name='blogger.itemClass' value='pid-1421013598'/></entry><entry><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-10889081.post-6529374861647630749</id><published>2009-04-25T16:53:00.000-04:00</published><updated>2009-04-25T16:53:00.000-04:00</updated><title type='text'>Scott Montgomery's &lt;a href="http://www.cardplayer....</title><content type='html'>Scott Montgomery's &lt;A HREF="http://www.cardplayer.com/poker-news/blogs/article/5066" REL="nofollow"&gt;take on the schedule&lt;/A&gt; is also interesting.</content><link rel='edit' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/10889081/713644857246051424/comments/default/6529374861647630749'/><link rel='self' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/10889081/713644857246051424/comments/default/6529374861647630749'/><link rel='alternate' type='text/html' href='http://www.onlinepokerinsiders.com/2009/04/wsop-tv-schedule-analysis.html?showComment=1240692780000#c6529374861647630749' title=''/><author><name>Fifth Street Journal</name><uri>http://www.blogger.com/profile/00288432340942450595</uri><email>noreply@blogger.com</email><gd:image xmlns:gd='http://schemas.google.com/g/2005' rel='http://schemas.google.com/g/2005#thumbnail' width='16' height='16' src='http://img2.blogblog.com/img/b16-rounded.gif'/></author><thr:in-reply-to xmlns:thr='http://purl.org/syndication/thread/1.0' href='http://www.onlinepokerinsiders.com/2009/04/wsop-tv-schedule-analysis.html' ref='tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-10889081.post-713644857246051424' source='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/10889081/posts/default/713644857246051424' type='text/html'/><gd:extendedProperty xmlns:gd='http://schemas.google.com/g/2005' name='blogger.itemClass' value='pid-2066854398'/></entry><entry><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-10889081.post-7124048759946038077</id><published>2009-04-25T16:48:00.000-04:00</published><updated>2009-04-25T16:48:00.000-04:00</updated><title type='text'>If I'd have thought of it at the time I would have...</title><content type='html'>If I'd have thought of it at the time I would have added: 8 hours covering day 1 of the Main Event is ridiculous. They couldn't move some of those hours to covering the final table, or other events?</content><link rel='edit' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/10889081/713644857246051424/comments/default/7124048759946038077'/><link rel='self' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/10889081/713644857246051424/comments/default/7124048759946038077'/><link rel='alternate' type='text/html' href='http://www.onlinepokerinsiders.com/2009/04/wsop-tv-schedule-analysis.html?showComment=1240692480000#c7124048759946038077' title=''/><author><name>Fifth Street Journal</name><uri>http://www.blogger.com/profile/00288432340942450595</uri><email>noreply@blogger.com</email><gd:image xmlns:gd='http://schemas.google.com/g/2005' rel='http://schemas.google.com/g/2005#thumbnail' width='16' height='16' src='http://img2.blogblog.com/img/b16-rounded.gif'/></author><thr:in-reply-to xmlns:thr='http://purl.org/syndication/thread/1.0' href='http://www.onlinepokerinsiders.com/2009/04/wsop-tv-schedule-analysis.html' ref='tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-10889081.post-713644857246051424' source='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/10889081/posts/default/713644857246051424' type='text/html'/><gd:extendedProperty xmlns:gd='http://schemas.google.com/g/2005' name='blogger.itemClass' value='pid-2066854398'/></entry></feed>
